[1]谢文锋,张有洋.边界层参数化方案对华南一次暖区强对流过程的模拟影响研究[J].气象研究与应用,2024,45(01):72-77.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.1.12]
　XIE Wenfeng,ZHANG Youyang.The effects of boundary layer parameterization schemes on the simulation of a strong warm-sector convective process over South China[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2024,45(01):72-77.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.1.12]
点击复制

边界层参数化方案对华南一次暖区强对流过程的模拟影响研究()
分享到：

气象研究与应用[ISSN:1673-8411/CN:45-1356/P]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
72-77
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2024-05-07

文章信息/Info

Title:
The effects of boundary layer parameterization schemes on the simulation of a strong warm-sector convective process over South China
作者:
谢文锋;  张有洋
中国民用航空中南地区空中交通管理局, 广州 510405
Author(s):
XIE Wenfeng;  ZHANG Youyang
Middle South Regional Air Traffic Management Bureau of CAAC, Guangzhou 510405, China
关键词:
暖区; 强对流; 边界层方案; 数值模拟
Keywords:
warm sector; strong convection; boundary layer parameterization; numerical simulation
分类号:
P458
DOI:
10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.1.12
摘要:
基于天气研究和预报模式(WRF)中尺度数值模式,比较分析四种边界层参数化方案(YSU、MYJ、MYNN、ACM2)对华南暖区强对流过程模拟的影响。结果表明:(1)四个方案均模拟出广东区域午后有强对流天气发展,但模拟的平均降水量比实况偏小,最大降水强度出现时间滞后1~2 h。(2)四个方案模拟的气温垂直分布与实况非常接近,模拟的850 hPa以下的低层湿度整体偏大,而模拟的800~950 hPa风速整体偏小。(3)相比之下,YSU非局地闭合方案模拟的对流回波形态整体与实况最接近,MYJ方案对低层区域800~950 hPa的风速模拟效果更好,且模拟的较强降水出现时段更接近实况。(4) MYJ和MYNN虽同为局地闭合方案,但模拟结果有较大差异,MYNN方案模拟的低层风速、地面感热通量和潜热通量要明显小于MYJ方案,而YSU和ACM2方案模拟结果差异相对较小。
Abstract:
Based on the WRF mesoscale numerical model, the effects of four boundary layer parameterization schemes (YSU, MYJ, MYNN, ACM2) on the simulation of a strong warm-sector convection process in South China are compared and analyzed. The results show that:(1) all four schemes can simulate the development of strong convective weather in Guangdong in the afternoon, but the simulated average precipitation is smaller than the actual situation, and the simulated maximum precipitation intensity appears with a time lag of 1~2 hours. (2) The vertical distribution of temperatures simulated by the four schemes are very close to the actual situation. The simulated humidity in the low level below 850 hPa is generally larger, while the simulated wind speeds between 800~950 hPa are small. (3) In contrast, the convective echo pattern simulated by the non-local closure schemes YSU is the closest to the actual situation, while the MYJ scheme is more effective in simulating the wind speeds in the low-level region from 800~950 hPa, and the simulated time of occurrence of heavier precipitation is closer to the actual situation. (4) Although MYJ and MYNN are both local closure schemes, there are significant differences in their simulation results. The simulated lowlevel wind speeds, surface sensible heat fluxes, and latent heat fluxes of MYNN scheme are significantly smaller than those of the MYJ scheme, while the difference between the simulation results of YSU and ACM2 schemes is relatively small.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邱贵强,李华,张宇,等.高寒草原地区边界层参数化方案的适用性评估[J].高原气象,2013,32(1):46-55.
[2] 陈有利,徐慧燕,卢美,等.用调整边界层湍流系数的QNSE方案模拟夏秋季沿海大风的应用研究[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2018,45(3):343-350, 362.
[3] 崔驰潇,包云轩,袁成松,等.不同边界层参数化方案对江苏地区一次平流雾过程的模拟影响[J].大气科学,2018, 42(6):1344-1362.
[4] HUANG L. Sensitivity analysis of ensemble simulations on a torrential rainfall case over South China using multiple PBL and SL parameterization[s J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2020,26(2):208-222.
[5] 仲鹏志,冶磊,李煜斌,等.不同边界层参数化方案对台风"利奇马"模拟的影响研究[J].热带气象学报, 2022, 38(2):275-289.
[6] 高亭亭,梁卫,罗聪,等.广州前汛期暴雨气候特征分析[J].广东气象,2012,34(2):1-4, 9.
[7] 陈翔翔,丁治英,刘彩虹,等. 2000-2009年5、6月华南暖区暴雨形成系统统计分析[J].热带气象学报,2012, 28(5):707-718.
[8] 刘梦娟,张旭,陈葆德.边界层参数化方案在"灰色区域"尺度下的适用性评估[J].大气科学,2018,42(1):52-69.
[9] 覃艳秋,刘蕾.华南锋前暖区暴雨研究概述[J].气象研究与应用,2017,38(1):26-29.
[10] 谌芸,陈涛,汪玲瑶,等.中国暖区暴雨的研究进展[J].暴雨灾害,2019,38(5):483-493.
[11] 黄滢,黄春华,刘金裕.广西一次持续性暖区暴雨特征及成因分析[J].气象研究与应用, 2022, 43(3):50-55.
[12] 覃皓,农孟松,邱滋,等.2022年广西"龙舟水"暖区暴雨中低空急流的日变化机制[J].气象研究与应用, 2023, 44(1):20-25.
[13] 邓明,杨亚钦,李江南.城市下垫面对华南地区前汛期暴雨的影响初探[J].气象研究与应用, 2017, 38(3):23-25, 30.
[14] 沈新勇,马铮,郭春燕,等.不同边界层参数化方案对一次梅雨锋暴雨过程湍流交换特征模拟的影响[J].热带气象学报,2017,33(6):793-811.

相似文献/References:

[1]林确略,邓雅倩,陈明璐,等.广西一次槽前型暖区飑线的中尺度分析[J].气象研究与应用,2018,39(01):38.
　Lin Quelue,Deng Yaqian,Chen Minglu,et al.A mesoscale analysis on a warm-sector squall line in front of the trough occurred in Guangxi[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2018,39(01):38.
[2]王茂书,刘锐,龙俊天,等.巴中地区强对流天气预报方法研究[J].气象研究与应用,2019,40(04):18.
　Wang Maoshu,Liu Rui,Long Juntian,et al.Study on the forecast method of strong convective weather in Bazhong area[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2019,40(01):18.
[3]周云霞,农孟松,黄荣,等.2023年广西高影响强对流天气特征及预报预警回顾[J].气象研究与应用,2024,45(02):95.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.2.16]
　ZHOU Yunxia,NONG Mengsong,HUANG Rong,et al.Review of the characteristics and forecasting warnings of high-impact severe convective weather in Guangxi in 2023[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2024,45(01):95.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.2.16]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-12-22。
作者简介:谢文锋(1988-),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事航空气象预报工作。E-mail:victory_xie@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01