[1]李敏,侯安校,劳小青,等.海南岛三维、二维闪电定位数据时空分布和参数特征对比分析[J].气象研究与应用,2024,45(01):90-95.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.1.15]
　LI Min,HOU Anxiao,LAO Xiaoqing,et al.Comparative analysis of spatiotemporal distribution and parameter characteristics of 3D and 2D lightning location data on Hainan Island[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2024,45(01):90-95.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.1.15]
点击复制

海南岛三维、二维闪电定位数据时空分布和参数特征对比分析()
分享到：

气象研究与应用[ISSN:1673-8411/CN:45-1356/P]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
90-95
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2024-05-07

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative analysis of spatiotemporal distribution and parameter characteristics of 3D and 2D lightning location data on Hainan Island
作者:
李敏1; 2;  侯安校3;  劳小青2;  高燚2;  周方聪2
1. 海南省南海气象防灾减灾重点实验室, 海口 570203;
2. 海南省气象灾害防御技术中心, 海口 570203;
3. 海南省气象服务中心, 海口 570203
Author(s):
LI Min1; 2;  HOU Anxiao3;  LAO Xiaoqing2;  GAO Yi2;  ZHOU Fangcong2
1. Key Laboratory of South China Sea Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Hainan Province, Haikou 570203, China;
2. Hainan Meteorological Disaster Prevention Technology Center, Haikou 570203, China;
3. Hainan Meteorological Service Center, Haikou 570203, China
关键词:
三维地闪; 二维地闪; 三维云闪
Keywords:
three-dimensional ground flash; two-dimensional ground flash; three-dimensional cloud flash
分类号:
P427
DOI:
10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2024.1.15
摘要:
对2021-2022年4-10月海南岛三维、二维闪电定位数据进行质控处理,以及有关数据时空分布和参数特征进行对比分析。结果表明,对比探测灵敏度和探测效率,三维闪电定位系统明显优于二维闪电定位系统。二维地闪、三维地闪、三维云闪的密度分布和时分布特征相似,密度高值中心分布在海南岛西部的儋州、白沙等地,时分布呈单峰曲线特征,峰期在15:00-16:00。三维地闪、三维云闪的月分布呈三峰曲线特征,5月为主峰期、7月为次峰期、9月为第三峰期,二维地闪的月分布呈单峰曲线特征,7月为高峰期。二维正地闪占比低于三维正地闪占比,二维正、负地闪的电流中位数比三维的高;二维正、负地闪的电流幅值分别以10~20 kA、20~30 kA为地闪次数的高峰区,三维正、负地闪的电流幅值以0~10 kA为地闪次数的高峰区。质控后的二维地闪、三维地闪、三维云闪的密度分布和时分布、月分布基本特征相似,表明质控方法合理有效。
Abstract:
The three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) lightning positioning data on Hainan Island from April to October of 2021-2022 are processed for quality control, and the spatiotemporal distribution and parameter characteristics of the two systems are compared and analyzed. The results show that:the 3D lightning positioning system is significantly better than the 2D lightning positioning system in terms of detection sensitivity and detection efficiency. The density distribution and time distribution characteristics of 2D ground lightning, 3D ground lightning and 3D cloud lightning are similar, with the high density centers distributed in Danzhou and Baisha in the west of Hainan Island, and the time distribution is characterized by unimodal curve, with the peak period at 15:00-16:00. The monthly distribution of 3D ground lightning and 3D cloud lightning is characterized by a triple-peak curve, with May as the main peak, July as the second peak, and September as the third peak, and that of 2D ground lightning is characterized by a singlepeak curve, with July as the peak period. The monthly distribution of 2D ground flashes is characterized by a single-peak curve, with July as the peak period. The percentage of 2D positive ground lightning is lower than that of 3D positive ground lightning, and the median current of 2D positive and negative ground lightning is higher than that of 3D positive and negative ground lightning; the current amplitudes of 2D positive and negative ground lightning are 10~20 kA and 20~30 kA, respectively, as the peaks of the ground lightning, and the current amplitudes of 3D positive and negative ground lightning are 0~10 kA as the peaks of the ground lightning. After quality control, the density distributions of 2D ground lightning, 3D ground lightning and 3D clound lightning are similar to the time and monthly distributions, indicating that the quality control method is reasonable and effective.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王春乙,吴慧,邢旭煌,等.海南气候[M].北京:气象出版社, 2014:71-73.
[2] 候安校,周方聪,邓发斌,等.近10年海南省雷电灾情及其对闪电定位性能的评估[J].气象研究与应用, 2022, 43(2):80-86.
[3] 劳小青,韦传波,周方聪.西南低压槽影响下的海南岛地闪活动特征[J].气象科技进展, 2021, 11(4):7-11.
[4] 李敏,劳小青,高燚,等.南海低压槽影响下的海南岛地闪活动特征[J].海南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(2):169-176.
[5] 劳小青,周方聪,潘家利,等.海南岛低压槽类天气系统雷达回波和地闪特征分析[J].气象与环境科学, 2021, 44(1):96-103.
[6] 高燚,蒙小亮,劳小青.基于聚类分析的海南岛雷电灾害易损度风险区划[J].自然灾害学报, 2013, 22(1):175-182.
[7] 高燚,陈汇林,劳小青,等.海南文昌火箭发射场雷电环境分析[J].自然灾害学报, 2012, 21(4):182-189.
[8] 郭冬艳,陈红,陈有龙,等.海南岛地闪活动的时空特征与海陆风关系[J].2020, 10(4):102-107.
[9] 许洪泽,周梅.基于ADTD闪电定位网探测效率的评估分析[J].河南科技, 2017(1):126-128.
[10] 李庆申,陈宇涵,张阳,等.DDW1闪电定位系统及性能评估[J].气象科技, 2020, 48(6):788-794.
[11] 余蓉,杜牧云,晏紫淙,等.湖北省两套闪电定位网地闪数据的对比分析[J].暴雨灾害, 2021, 40(4):646-654.
[12] 国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.基于雷电定位系统(LLS)的地闪密度总则:GB/T 37047-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2018.
[13] 陈绿文,黄智慧,禹继,等.一次人工触发闪电事件的定位误差分析[J].广东气象, 2010, 32(1):15-17, 21.
[14] 崔雪东,张卫斌,王芳.浙江省二维和三维闪电定位系统对比分析及效能评估[J].科技通报, 2020, 36(7):14-20.
[15] 张科杰,谢超,郑琦玉.湖北ADTD闪电定位系统监测数据质量分析[J].气象科技, 2022, 50(2):179-188.
[16] 邹斌,崔海华,张其林,等.海南地区山体地形对地闪回击定位精度的影响[J].科技技术与工程, 2021, 21(28):11989-11998.
[17] 殷启元,范祥鹏,张义军,等.一次"晴天霹雳"致死事件分析[J].气象学报, 2019, 77(2):292-302.
[18] 赵伟,姜瑜君,童杭伟,等.浙江省两套闪电定位系统地闪数据对比[J].应用气象学报, 2015, 26(3):354-363.
[19] 王慧,高玉龙,胡晋.基于VLF/LF三维闪电定位仪资料的湖北省闪电特征分析[J].气象水文海洋仪器, 2021, 38(3):48-52.
[20] 吴凡,崔晓鹏,张大林,等. 2005-07年北京地区地闪和云闪的统计特征[C]//中国气象学会.第33届中国气象学会年会S19雷电物理和防雷新技术——第十四届防雷减灾论坛.2016.
[21] 劳小青,石华,李敏.海南岛正地闪时空分布特征的分析[J].海南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(3):288-296.
[22] 成勤,王学良,肖稳安,等.我国中部五省云地闪电时空分布特征分析[J].暴雨灾害, 2011, 30(3):254-259.
[23] 田芳,肖稳安,冯民学,等.闪电定位仪观测结果的修订分析[J].华东电力, 2008, 38(6):38-42.
[24] 李京校,郭凤霞,扈海波,等. 2017北京及其周边地区SAFIR和ADTD闪电定位资料对比分析[J].高原气象, 36(4):1115-1126.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-10-21。
基金项目:海南省自然科学基金项目(2019RC361、421MS103、422MS151),海南省气象局科研项目(hnqxZC202111)
作者简介:李敏(1979-),女,工程师,主要从事雷电灾害防御工作。E-mail:252096762@qq.com
通讯作者:侯安校(1966-),男,高级工程师,主要从事灾害防御工作。Email:houanxiao@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01