[1]农孟松,翟丽萍,屈梅芳,等.两种雷暴大风的结构特征及其环境条件对比分析[J].气象研究与应用,2019,40(02):1-6,37.
　Nong Mengsong,Zhai Liping,Qu Meifang,et al.Comparative Analysis of Structural Characteristics and Environmental Conditions of Two Kinds of Thunderstorms and Gales[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2019,40(02):1-6,37.
点击复制

两种雷暴大风的结构特征及其环境条件对比分析()
分享到：

气象研究与应用[ISSN:1673-8411/CN:45-1356/P]

卷:
第40卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
1-6,37
栏目:
天气气候
出版日期:
2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Analysis of Structural Characteristics and Environmental Conditions of Two Kinds of Thunderstorms and Gales
作者:
农孟松;  翟丽萍;  屈梅芳;  赖珍权
广西区气象台, 南宁 530022
Author(s):
Nong Mengsong;  Zhai Liping;  Qu Meifang;  Lai Zhenquan
Guangxi Meteorological Observatory, Nanning Guangxi 530022
关键词:
雷暴大风; 微下击暴流; 飑线; 环境条件
Keywords:
thunderstorm gale; slight downburst; squall line; environmental conditions
分类号:
0212.4
摘要:
2014年3月29日晚到31日早上，广西连续两个晚上在同一区域出现了两种不同类型的雷暴大风，这两类雷暴大风在形态结构演变和环境条件上存在明显的差异。30日雷暴大风表现为多个孤立、松散、排列无序的强单体风暴，属于微湿下击暴流、低层暖平流强迫类，其层结为条件性不稳定，由地面辐合线触发；31日的雷暴大风则是由有组织、紧密排列的多单体强风暴组成的飑线系统，其后侧入流明显，有平流作用，风暴范围大，属于高空冷平流强迫类，其层结为对流性不稳定，由地面锋面触发产生。从环境条件上来看，30日雷暴大风的温湿廓线呈倒V型结构，中层湿度相对较大，低层干且温度直减率近干绝热；31日雷暴大风的温湿廓线表现为850hPa以下大气层结曲线与露点曲线紧靠，水汽充足，以上两者分离，干层显著，呈“漏斗”状，另外，31日雷暴大风的垂直风切变较大，更有利于对流的组织化。
Abstract:
Taking the occurrence of two different type thunderstorms in the same region for two consecutive nights in Guangxi (from March 29 to 31, 2014) as an example, the differences in morphological structure evolution and environmental conditions between the two types of thunderstorms were analyzed. The results showed that the thunderstorm gale on the 30th was characterized by several isolated, loose and disorderly strong monomer storms, which belonged to the category of mild wet downburst and low-level warm advection forcing. Its stratification was conditionally unstable and triggered by the surface convergence line. Thunderstorm gale on 31st was a squall line system consisting of organized and tightly arranged multi-unit strong storms. Its rear inflow was obvious, advection effect was obvious, storm range was large, belonging to cold advection forcing type at high altitude, and its stratifcation is convective instability, triggered by the surface front. From the point of view of environmental conditions, the temperature and humidity profile of thunderstorm gale on 30th presented an inverted V-shaped structure, with a relatively large humidity in the middle layer and a dry lower layer, and the lapse rate of temperature is nearly dry adiabatic. The temperature and humidity profles of thunderstorm gale on 31st show that the atmospheric stratifcation curve and dew point curve were close to each other below 850hPa, and the water vapor was abundant.; the above two were separated, and the dry layer was distinct, showing a funnel shape. In addition, the vertical wind shear of thunderstorm gale on 31st was larger, which was more conducive to the organization of convection.

参考文献/References:

[1] Fujita T T.Manual of downburst identification for project NIMROD[R].Satellite and Mesometeorology Research Paper 156,dept.of Geophysical Science es, University of Chicargo,1978:104-112.
[2] Smull B F,Houze Jr R A.A mid-latitude squall line with a trailing region of stratiform rain:radar and satellite observations[J].Mon Wea Rev,1985,113(1):117-133.
[3] Smull B F,Houze Jr R A.Rear inflow in squall line with trailing stratiform precipitation[J].Mon Wea Rev,1987,15(12):2869-2889.
[4] James R P,Markowski P M,Fritsch J M.Bow echo ensitivity to ambient moisture and cold pool strength[J].Mon Wea Rev,2006,134(3):950-964.
[5] Takemi T.A sensitivity of squall-line intensity to environmental static stability under various shear and moisture conditions[J].Atmos Res,2007, 84(4):374-389.
[6] 孙建华, 郑淋淋, 赵思雄. 水汽含量对飑线组织结构和强度影响的数值试验[J]. 大气科学,2014,38(4):742-755.
[7] 张文龙, 王迎春, 崔晓鹏, 等. 北京地区干湿雷暴数值实验对比研究[J]. 暴雨灾害,2011,118(3):202-209.
[8] 王秀明, 周小刚, 俞小鼎. 雷暴大风环境特征及其对风暴结构影响的对比研究[J]. 气象学报,2013,71(5):839-852.
[9] Roberts R D,Wilson J W.Aproposed microbust nowcasting procedure using single-Doppler radar[J].Appl Meteor,2010,28(4):285-303.
[10] 许爱华, 孙继松, 许东蓓, 等.中国中东部强对流天气的天气形势分类和基本要素配置特征[J]. 气象, 2014,40(4):400-411.
[11] Atkins N T,Wakimoto R M.Wet microburst activity activity over the southeastern United State[J]. Wea Forecasting,1991,6(4):470-482.
[12] 樊李苗,俞小鼎.中国短时强对流天气的若干环境参数特征分析[J].高原气象,2013,32(1):156-165.
[13] Srivastsva R C.A simple model of evaporatively driven downdrafts:Application to microburst downdraft[J].Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences,1985,42(10):1004-1023.

相似文献/References:

[1]崔丽曼.河南省雷暴大风气候特征及近年变化趋势分析[J].气象研究与应用,2016,37(03):33.
　Cui Liman.Climate Characteristics and Changing Trend of Thunder-gust during Recent Years of Henan[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2016,37(02):33.
[2]屈梅芳,古明悦.不同天气系统影响下阵风锋的对比分析[J].气象研究与应用,2016,37(02):20.
　Qu Mei-fang,Gu Ming-yue.Comparative analysis of gust front under the influence of different weather systems[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2016,37(02):20.
[3]黄嘉浩,汤中明,欧坚莲.2019年“6.11”广西雷暴大风天气成因分析[J].气象研究与应用,2020,41(02):75.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2020.2.15]
　Huang Jiahao,Tang Zhongming,Ou Jianlian.Cause analysis of thunderstorm and gale weather in Guangxi on June 11, 2019[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2020,41(02):75.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2020.2.15]
[4]杨金红,吴蕾,李瑞义,等.雷达监测产品在2021年强对流天气中的应用分析[J].气象研究与应用,2022,43(02):93.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2022.2.16]
　Yang Jinhong,Wu Lei,Li Ruiyi,et al.Application analysis of radar monitoring products in severe convective weather in 2021[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2022,43(02):93.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2022.2.16]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-01-30。
基金项目:广西自然科学基金项目（2018GXNSFBA281178),中国气象局预报员专项（CMAYBX2019-084)，广西壮族自治区气象局短时临近天气预报技术创新团队项目。
作者简介:农孟松(1965-),女,广西靖西人,正研级高工,主要从事灾害性天气预报与研究工作。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01