[1]杨思施,杨再位,黄飞.基于不同取样方法的百色市强降雨雨型研究[J].气象研究与应用,2019,40(04):63-65,76.
　Yang Sishi,Yang Zaiwei,Huang Fei.Study on heavy rainfall patterns in Baise City based on different sampling methods[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2019,40(04):63-65,76.
点击复制

基于不同取样方法的百色市强降雨雨型研究()
分享到：

气象研究与应用[ISSN:1673-8411/CN:45-1356/P]

卷:
第40卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
63-65,76
栏目:
应用气象
出版日期:
2019-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on heavy rainfall patterns in Baise City based on different sampling methods
作者:
杨思施;  杨再位;  黄飞
广西百色市气象局, 百色 533000
Author(s):
Yang Sishi;  Yang Zaiwei;  Huang Fei
Baise Meteorological Service, Baise Guangxi 533000
关键词:
暴雨强度; 雨峰; 设计雨型; 百色市
Keywords:
rainstorm intensity; rain peak; design rain pattern; Baise City
分类号:
P456.8
摘要:
利用百色气象站1955-2014年逐分钟降雨资料，采用"自然法"和"最大值法"两种取样方法研究了百色市重现期2a历时30-180min的芝加哥设计雨型，同时对两种取样方法雨型结果进行对比分析。结果表明：（1）"自然法"历时30min的芝加哥设计雨型峰值位于降雨过程的中间位置，历时60-180min的峰值位于降雨过程的中间靠前位置；"最大值法"历时30-180min芝加哥设计雨型峰值位于降雨过程的三分之一位置。（2）历时越长，两种方法峰值位置的降雨强度越大。（3）"自然法"的雨峰位置比"最大值法"的雨峰位置靠后，且"自然法"的雨峰峰值比"最大值法"明显。
Abstract:
Based on the 60-year rainfall data of Baise meteorological station from 1955 to 2014, two sampling methods-natural method and maximum method were used to study the Chicago design rain pattern with a return period of 2 years, which lasted for 30-180min, and the results of the two sampling methods were analyzed. The results showed that (1) by using natural method, the peak value (process lasting 30min) was located in the middle of the rainfall process, and the peak value (process lasting 60-180min) was located in the front middle of the rainfall process. In the maximum method, the process lasted for 30-180min, and the peak value was located at one third of the rainfall process. (2) The longer the duration was, the greater the rainfall intensity was at the peak of the two methods. (3) The rain peak location of natural method was later than that of maximum method, and the peak value of natural method was greater than that of maximum method.

参考文献/References:

[1] 江浩,江炎生,郑治军,等.城市内涝综合设计暴雨研究[J].水电能源科学,2016(6):53-56.
[2] 张明珠,曾娇娇,黄国如,等.市政排水与水利排涝设计暴雨重现期衔接关系的分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015(1):131-135.
[3] 成丹,陈正洪,方怡.宜昌市区短历时暴雨雨型特征[J].暴雨灾害,2015,34(3):249-253.
[4] 谢东,苏小玲,刘蕾,等.基于芝加哥法的柳州市设计暴雨雨型研究[J].气象研究与应用,2018,39(3):72-75.
[5] 赵华睿,宋煜,李昱茜,等.暴雨强度公式编制之基础数据质量控制[J].气象研究与应用,2018,39(4):58-61.
[6] 李昌伟.沈阳市短历时设计暴雨雨型研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2017.
[7] 马京津,宋丽莉,张晓婧.对两种不同取样方法Pilgrim& Cordery设计雨型的比较研究[J].暴雨灾害,2016,35(3):220-226.
[8] 周绍毅,卢小凤,罗红磊.南宁市短历时暴雨演变特征分析[J].气象研究与应用,2016,37(1),64-67.
[9] 住房和城乡建设部,中国气象局.城市暴雨强度公式编制和设计暴雨雨型确定技术导则[S].2014.
[10] 周绍毅,罗红磊,苏志,等.南宁市新一代暴雨强度公式与暴雨雨型研究[J].气象研究与应用,2017,38(2):1-5.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵华睿,宋煜,李昱茜,等.暴雨强度公式编制之基础数据质量控制[J].气象研究与应用,2018,39(04):58.
　Zhao Huarui,Song Yu,Li Yuqian,et al.Basic data quality control for rainstorm intensity formula[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2018,39(04):58.
[2]刘国忠,覃卫坚,董良淼,等.2023年广西暴雨强度极端性分析[J].气象研究与应用,2023,44(04):1.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2023.4.01]
　LIU Guozhong,QIN Weijian,DONG Liangmiao,et al.Analysis on the intensity of extreme rainstorm in Guangxi in 2023[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2023,44(04):1.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2023.4.01]
[3]周绍毅,罗红磊,苏志,等.南宁市新一代暴雨强度公式与暴雨雨型研究[J].气象研究与应用,2017,38(02):1.
　Zhou Shaoyi,Luo Honglei,Su Zhi,et al.Research on a new-generation of rainstorm intensity formula and rainstorm pattern for Nanning[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2017,38(04):1.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-26。
基金项目:百色市气象局科研计划项目"百色市短历时暴雨雨型研究"
作者简介:杨思施(1986-),男,汉族,广西百色人,工程师,从事气象科技服务工作。E-mail:227020011@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01