[1]卢小凤,李仲怡,陈剑飞,等.智能网格产品在西江流域面雨量预报中的应用检验[J].气象研究与应用,2020,41(02):45-49.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2020.2.09]
 Lu Xiaofeng,Li Zhongyi,Chen Jianfei,et al.Application test of intelligent grid products in Xijiang River Basin precipitation forecast[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2020,41(02):45-49.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2020.2.09]
点击复制

智能网格产品在西江流域面雨量预报中的应用检验()
分享到:

气象研究与应用[ISSN:1673-8411/CN:45-1356/P]

卷:
第41卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
45-49
栏目:
新技术应用
出版日期:
2020-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application test of intelligent grid products in Xijiang River Basin precipitation forecast
作者:
卢小凤1 李仲怡1 陈剑飞1 叶庚姣1 陈丹2
1. 广西壮族自治区气象灾害防御技术中心, 南宁 530022;
2. 广西壮族自治区气象科学研究所, 南宁 530022
Author(s):
Lu Xiaofeng1 Li Zhongyi1 Chen Jianfei1 Ye Gengjiao1 Chen Dan2
1. Guangxi Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Technology Center, Nanning 530022;
2. Guangxi Institute of Meteorological Science, Nanning 530022
关键词:
智能网格面雨量预报检验西江流域
Keywords:
intelligent gridareal rainfallforecasttestXijiang River Basin
分类号:
P49
DOI:
10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2020.2.09
摘要:
为了解基于智能网格降水产品的西江流域面雨量短期预报效果,采用TS评分、漏报率、空报率指标对2019年前汛期(4-6月)和后汛期(7-9月)西江流域20-20时的日面雨量预报进行检验评估。结果表明,汛期各流域TS评分随着面雨量等级增大呈现下降趋势,然而72h内随着预报时效延长,预报效果较为稳定;前汛期东部流域TS评分较西部流域普遍高,而后汛期西部流域的TS评分有所上升;前汛期各级面雨量空报率大于漏报率,而后汛期各级面雨量漏报率较前汛期普遍上升,空报率普遍下降。72h内预报效果受到降水量级因素影响较大,而受到时效延长影响较小;流域预报效果变化可能与西江流域汛期雨带逐渐推进变化有关。
Abstract:
In order to study the effect of short-term area rainfall forecast of Xijiang River Basin based on intelligent grid precipitation products, the TS scores, false negative rate, and empty report rate indicators are used for the evaluation of daily area rainfall forecast from 8 pm to 8 pm in Xijiang River Basin during the pre-flood season (April-June) and the post-flood season (July-September). The results showed that the TS score of each basin in flood season decreased with the increase of areal rainfall level, but the prediction effect was relatively stable with the extension of prediction time within 72 hours. The TS score of the eastern basin in pre-flood season was generally higher than that of the western basin, while that of the western basin in the post-flood season was higher. In the pre-flood season, the absent forecast quotiety of area rainfall was higher than that of missing rate; in the post-flood season, the missing rate was generally higher than that in the pre-flood season, while the absent forecast quotiety became lower. That is to say, the forecast effect within 72 hours was greatly affected by precipitation magnitude factors, but less affected by time lapse; the changes of basin forecast effect may be related to the gradual advance of the rain belt in the flood season of Xijiang River Basin.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈海山,孙照渤.陆面模式CLSM的设计及性能检验Ⅱ.模式检验[J].大气科学,2005,29(2):272-282.
[2] 王雨,公颖,陈法敬,等.区域业务模式6h降水预报检验方案比较[J].应用气象学报,2013,24(2):171-78.
[3] 潘留杰,张宏芳,王建鹏.数值天气预报检验方法研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(3):327-335.
[4] 陈伟斌,韩慎友,刘国忠.欧洲集合预报产品降水预报检验分析[J].气象研究与应用,2017,38(2):6-9.
[5] 曾鹏,钟利华,李勇.基于贝叶斯方法的西江流域大雨集合概率预报产品订正试验[J].气象研究与应用,2018,39(3):21-25.
[6] 曾鹏,钟利华,李勇.西江流域大雨环流特征与天气分型[J].气象研究与应用,2016,37(S1):31-33.
[7] 钟利华,钟仕全,曾鹏,等.基于GIS的西江流域面雨量计算方法与监测预警[J].气象研究与应用,2015,36(1):38-42,52,131.
[8] 中国气象局.GB/T 20486-2017江河流域面雨量等级[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[9] 朱占云,潘娅英,骆月珍,等.浙江省水库流域面雨量的多模式预报效果分析与检验[J].气象与环境科学,2017,40(3):93-100.
[10] 吴娟,林荷娟,刘敏,等.太湖流域汛期面雨量多模式预报检验评估[J].水利水电快报,2017,38(10):22-27.
[11] 唐延婧,彭芳,尚媛媛,等.乌江流域面雨量的WRF预报检验[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(10):232-239.

相似文献/References:

[1]钟利华,钟仕全,曾鹏,等.基于GIS的广西电网流域面雨量计算方法与监测预警[J].气象研究与应用,2015,36(01):38.
 Zhong lihua,Zhong shiquan,Zeng peng,et al.The Calculation Method, Real-time Monitoring and Warning of areal precipitation for Xijiang River Basin by GIS[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2015,36(02):38.
[2]程思,韩赓,裴昌春.泉州市关键点FZMOS预报检验与误差分析[J].气象研究与应用,2019,40(03):35.
 Cheng Si,Lin Xiongjun,Pei Changchun.Forecast Assessment and Error Analysis of FZMOS Forecast in Key Stations of Quanzhou[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2019,40(02):35.
[3]李有华,卢小凤,陈剑飞,等.基于智能网格产品的广西行业气象服务集约化系统的设计与实现[J].气象研究与应用,2019,40(04):59.
 Li Youhua,Lu Xiaofeng,Chen Jianfei,et al.Design and implementation of Guangxi industry meteorological service intensive system based on intelligent grid products[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2019,40(02):59.
[4]曾鹏,钟利华,郑凤琴,等.基于智能网格降水产品的降尺度释用技术研究[J].气象研究与应用,2021,42(01):74.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2021.1.13]
 Zeng Peng,Zhong Lihua,Zheng Fengqin,et al.Research on downscaling interpretation technology based on intelligent grid precipitation products[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2021,42(02):74.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2021.1.13]
[5]李宗飞,陈凯华,赵玉娟.卷积神经网络和传统算法的雷达面雨量计算效果对比研究[J].气象研究与应用,2021,42(04):89.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2021.4.16]
 Li zongfei,Chen Kaihua,Zhao Yujuan.A comparative study of convolution neural network and traditional algorithm in radar area rainfall calculation[J].Journal of Meteorological Research and Application,2021,42(02):89.[doi:10.19849/j.cnki.CN45-1356/P.2021.4.16]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-05-09。
基金项目:广西气象局气象科研计划重点项目(桂气科2019Z05)
作者简介:卢小凤(1986-),女,广西百色人,硕士,工程师,主要从事专业气象预报研究与服务。E-mail:luxiaofeng_330@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01